Title: E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial: Special Edition

Media: PAL Video-CD (Malaysian Import)

Genre: Sci-Fi

Stars: Dee Wallace, Peter Coyote, Drew Barrymore, and Henry Thomas

Writer: Melissa Mathison

Director: Steven Spielberg

Feature length: 120 minutes

Languages: English Hi-Fi Stereo Sound

Subtitles: N/A

Packaging: Digipack Gatefold

Chapter Stops: 10

Sound: Hi-Fi Stereo Sound

Year of Theatrical Release: 1982/2002/VCD Release: 2002

Theatrical Distributor: Universal Pictures

Home Video Distributor: Universal Home Entertainment Through HVN (In Malaysia Only)

MPAA Rating: PG

Reviewer: Mark A. Rivera

The story has become a classic part of American pop culture and is timeless. To celebrate the 20th Anniversary of “E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial” Director Steven Spielberg added some unseen footage as well as a few new CGI effects and a remastered soundtrack. Then about a month ago Universal Home Entertainment released both a full-framed and widescreen Two-Disc Limited Collector’s Editions to DVD-Video containing both the 2002 and original 1982 version of the film as well as an Ultimate Gift Set version and even a VHS release of the 2002 version of the film. There has been some unforeseen controversy over the DVD release. I purchased the widescreen 2-disc set and was lucky the sticky tape they use to protect the contents from theft did not ruin the Digipack gatefold covering, but I know others have not and many are unhappy with the way the discs were packaged too. There is no spine to tell someone what the film is in one’s DVD library. Add to that some stuff regarding what is and is not included in the extra features and it all gets confusing. I still have not had the chance to watch Universal’s DVD release of “E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial,” but it is not unusual for me to buy a movie and then not watch it for as long as a year because I am busy screening other movies sent to me and writing reviews.

So I received the VCD special edition import to review and I have to say this is the first time I have seen “E.T.” in years and what struck me about the film was just how good it still is after 20 years. Effects or no effects, the story is superb and one can just sense that Spielberg was on top of his game with this film and at times one can see hints of films to come like when Dee Wallace reads a young Drew Barrymore the story of “Peter Pan,” and yet there is so much more to be impressed with like the way Spielberg frames the scenes so we can visually understand who is doing what, where, and why just through the pure cinematic images alone. There is no denying the obvious; Steven Spielberg is truly one of the best American Directors of his generation and “E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial” is a classic that has stood the test of time.

Among the obvious additions and subtractions are the CGI replacement of guns with flashlights, which is odd since in an earlier scene where the mother has called the police to look for her missing son, we can see the gun in the holster on the cop’s right side so I am not sure what could be more upsetting to the viewers, a mother who thinks her son is missing or a bunch of guys in suits holding guns? The word “Terrorist” has been changed to “Hippie,” but why would a mother object to her son dressing like a hippie and the whole glasses and ski cap masks motif with the older brother’s friends at the film’s climactic bike chase scene seems somehow more out of place because by setting up that the older brother wanted to dress up like a terrorist for Halloween helps to sell the idea that he and hid fellow friends enjoy playing the “bad boys” role with the sunglasses and hat that covers everything but their eyes. They are not real bad kids, just kids and while in this day and age I agree that terrorism is not something one likes to think about, I also know that it is on every television and radio news program all the time so if kids cannot escape it in school or at home, why deny that it exists in a movie?

The CGI “E.T.” looks fine to me with more expression and wider eyes. I would have to compare this new cut to the original, but as far as I can tell, the 2002 version does not play badly at all. I just think the vocal and some cosmetic choices were not necessary, but thankfully Spielberg has given American DVD consumers to the opportunity to have both without breaking the bank. So what is the deal with the VCD then? The VCD presents the 2002 version in a full-framed (1.33:1) aspect ratio and the transfer is terrific. This is one of the best-looking VCD titles I have seen this year. There are no foreign subtitles that obscure the image and the digitally remastered Hi-Fi English Stereo Soundtrack kicks some serious butt. Both discs feature rudimentary menus as well. The packaging is a two-disc Digipack gatefold and it the artwork outside and within the packaging is glossy and this actually has a spine so you can read what the VCD set is in your library and the packaging seems sturdier too.

There are no extra features at all, but if one is looking for something they can playback on their laptop while on a plane or long train trip and they do not have a DVD-ROM drive, the VCD of “E.T.” is not a bad way to go. It is also an inexpensive way of sampling the new version of the film without having to resort to VHS. The way I see it is this VCD is a nice compliment to the DVD already available in America.

Please note that this VCD is PAL formatted, but should work in any computer with a Pentium processor or better and a compatible media player and CD-ROM drive. Please check your DVD-Video player’s documentation to see if your player can playback PAL and NTSC Video-CDs. Most do, but not all.

“E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial: Special Edition” VCD is available now and can be purchased online at www.eurekamovies.com.

© Copyright 2002 By Mark A. Rivera
All Rights Reserved.

Return To The Previous Page